Dr Disrespect not in exclusive YouTube stream deal talks, according to reports - Dexerto

Dr Disrespect reportedly isn’t joining YouTube despite Twitter tease

Published: 14/Jul/2020 3:40 Updated: 15/Jul/2020 9:35

by Isaac McIntyre


There’s still plenty of question marks over Dr Disrespect and his shock Twitch ban on June 26, as well as where the Two-Time might land next. One possible switch for the streamer can be ruled out though; he “definitely” won’t be joining YouTube, according to gaming insider Slasher.

Rumors have been swirling around the Doc’s ban story for two weeks now. Most recently, eyes have been on YouTube, and the Twitch star’s possible switch there, after Dr Disrespect ⁠— a streaming character created by game dev Guy Beahm all the way back in ⁠2010 ⁠— finally edited his Twitter bio in what many believe was a subtle tease. He moved his YouTube channel URL into the feature spot.

Dr Disrespect won’t be joining YouTube on any kind of exclusive deal, however. That’s according to gaming insider Rod ‘Slasher’ Breslau, who spoke about the Doc situation during a Twitch co-stream with platform star Hasan Piker.

Dr Disrespect Twitch ban
Instagram: @drdisrespect / Twitch
Twitch banned streaming superstar Dr Disrespect on June 26.

“No one is talking to Dr Disrespect. YouTube is not talking to Dr Disrespect, that discussion [on joining]… I can confirm that has not happened,” Breslau said during Piker’s broadcast on July 13. The insider also added he had heard YouTube already “feels like it’s in a pretty good position [with who they’ve signed].”

Breslau also confirmed the Doc’s disappearance is “not a platform move”. Instead, it’s a ban relating to a “severe criminal elements,” in Piker’s words. At the time of publication, however, there are no registered criminal arrests for Herschel Beahm.

Unfortunately, ruling out possible platform deals for the Doc doesn’t put anyone any closer to understanding the situation as a whole. Beahm seems to have kept relatively quiet in the last two weeks too; fellow streamer TimTheTatman said he “hasn’t heard from him” recently.

Tim did weigh in, however, on the alleged Dr Disrespect donation on NICKMERCS’ stream on July 5. According to reports from Aussie gossip site Sausage Roll, the Doc donated $50USD to say he was a “scapegoat” for Twitch.

“It scares me that some of you are so stupid that you think Doc donated that to Nick. That’s scary to me, because I’m really dumb, right? But I’m not that stupid!” TimTheTatman said on the alleged donation.

“That scares me, because it’s like… it’s alarming. Just so you understand, you can donate to Nick under any name. I could donate [pretending to be] the Doc! I could go on and pretend to be Symfuhny and say whatever I want! So stupid.”

With YouTube out of the picture, the Doc’s options seem to be getting slimmer. There were rumors he had penciled in a licensing agreement with Facebook Gaming, based on a ‘leaked’ contract document, but they have been ruled as fake.

Others have pointed to Swedish music platform Spotify, who is reportedly in the process of setting up their own streaming service.

Those rumors sparked to life after fans uncovered an old clip of Dr Disrespect admitting he had met with Joe Rogan’s producer Jaime Vernon just days after the podcaster signed a multi-million deal with Spotify.

Dr Disrespect during his final Twitch stream on June 25.
Twitch: Dr Disrespect
Dr Disrespect during the final moments of his last stream on June 25.

For now, fans are just going to have to sit tight. The Dr Disrespect ban saga doesn’t seem to be going anywhere anytime soon. We’re just about to hit day 18 without any news from Beahm as well. For all your updates, stick with Dexerto; we’ll cover each development on the Doc ban story as it happens.


Adam Fitch: Sorry Dr Disrespect, mobile esports are thriving

Published: 27/Nov/2020 17:00

by Adam Fitch


Earlier in November 2020, streamer Dr Disrespect spoke down towards mobile gamers on Twitter by questioning how it could be a “serious thing” — however, he’s just failing to understand how popular competition on mobile already is.

While mobile gamers and industry figures alike came to the defense of mobile gaming when the Two-Time took aim at the platform, there’s still a serious misconception around mobile esports and the success it’s already achieved.

Firstly, it’s worthwhile addressing the “serious” comment from Doc. While mobile devices perhaps don’t allow for precision that PCs do, there’s still a major skill gap between average and professional players and that lends itself perfectly to competition. The most common and widely-accepted definition of esports is a “video game played competitively for spectators,” mobile tournaments meet such a criteria on a daily basis and it’s already serious to hundreds of thousands of viewers on a weekly basis.

This skepticism from one of the faces of gaming is emblematic of a larger problem of platform elitism that plagues gaming on all levels. Ever since the popularization of esports there has been debate between console and PC gaming, centering around not only which type of players are better but whether console esports have unfair advantages due to features such as aim assist.

Ezreal in League of Legends Wild Rift
Riot Games
The most popular esports title, League of Legends, arrived on mobile in October 2020.

Tribalism is also a factor in this spritely, never-ending discussion, with players grouping together based on their platform of choice and nonsensically taking aim at those who have other preferences.

The only time in which such a debate would be productive is if cross-platform play is embraced in serious competition, which seems to be a long way away from ever becoming a reality. Fortnite developers Epic Games received plenty of criticism when implementing this feature in casual play, never mind in their esports activities, so it’s probably safe to assume no companies are rushing to make this a reality for the time being.

Infrastructure matters

Something that all good games need to be viable on a competitive level is infrastructure. Creating an appropriate structure for esports initiatives is important, whether it’s by a game’s developer or a third-party tournament organizer.

A great example of this in the realm of mobile esports is Clash Royale, one of the more popular titles from Finnish developers Supercell. The real-time strategy game has its own official team-based league from the company themselves, with top-tier gameplay spanning nine weeks and culminating in a year-ending world championship. This level of support and structure actually goes beyond what some PC and console games receive.

On the third-party organizer front, especially in the West, you only have to look as far as ESL to see how seriously mobile esports is being taken. As well as hosting regular online events for the likes of Call of Duty: Mobile, Clash of Clans, Brawls Stars, and Clash Royale, they have the ESL Mobile Open for elite players.

Clash Royale League World Finals
The Clash Royale League World Finals are always a spectacle, rivaling events in almost any other game.

Recently incorporating the Middle East and North Africa into the European arm of the competition, it’s said that ESL hosted over 500,000 players in the inaugural season alone. The second season involves PUBG Mobile, Auto Chess, Asphalt 9: Legends, and Clash of Clans, and will be expecting even more success with the widening of the player base.

In North America, the Mobile Open from ESL is already in its sixth season and has a headline sponsorship from the world’s largest telecommunications company, AT&T. There are other examples of infrastructure being fleshed out for mobile titles, but you get the gist.

A sight for sore eyes

One major factor of how we define success in esports is viewership. With a healthy amount of eyeballs on a product comes sponsorship opportunities, bragging rights, and further validation that fans are interested in watching the elite face off against each other.

With that in mind, it’s never been clearer that mobile esports isn’t just a major part of the future of the industry — it has already arrived. According to analytics agency Esports Charts, mobile events made up three of the five most popular tournaments in October 2020. This happened alongside the League of Legends World Championship taking place, which is not only one of the most anticipated occasions in the esports calendar but as it turned out to be one of the only LAN events we’d seen in six months.

Garena Free Fire
Free Fire hit a record of 100 million peak daily users earlier in 2020.

Asia and Latin America are where mobile esports are truly thriving at the moment, rivaling the popularity of any other title you decide to compare them with. This is proven from last month’s peak viewership statistics, where MOBA title Mobile Legends: Bang Bang and battle royale game Garena Free Fire occupied three of the top five placements.

Ryan ‘Fwiz’ Wyatt, the head of gaming at YouTube, posted a thread on Twitter on November 26 backed up the sheer popularity of Free Fire on the platform. In 2019, it was YouTube’s fourth most-viewed game and it’s proving to have some longevity considering its monthly viewership peaked in October 2020.

While this level of success isn’t replicated across all regions just yet, that’s how esports typically work. Call of Duty and Counter-Strike are mainly popular among those in North America and Europe, for example, which is reflected in the demographics of both the top-level players and the viewership alike. The same applies to mobile but it’s not an excuse for ignorance.

The future?

Mobile devices are generally more accessible than a high-end computer or new-generation gaming console so there’s a much higher ceiling on participation in mobile esports by default. Whether adoption from mobile users does indeed propel it into becoming the de facto competitive option is yet to be seen, but such potential can’t be ignored.

With viewership rivaling (and even oftentimes besting) that from console and PC esports alike, it’s sheer ignorance to state that mobile gaming isn’t already a major player in the industry. If you fail to see that from the investment that’s being funneled into mobile titles, or the number of people who already enjoy playing and spectating, then perhaps you’d like to argue that grass isn’t green too.