The London Spitfire dominated LA Valiant in the semi-finals to secure the first spot in the grand finals.
A second 3-0 series victory for the Spitfire secured a 2-0 win in the match against the Los Angeles Valiant, marking twelve consecutive map victories for London in the playoffs.
London Spitfire put together arguably the most formidable roster on paper for the start of the league, but after winning the Stage 1 playoffs the squad fell into a gradual decline that ended with a 9th-place Stage 4, just holding onto a spot in the overall playoffs.
It looked like the team would continue in that vein and meet an unceremonious end at the hands of the LA Gladiators in the quarter-finals, with London losing the first series of that match 0-3.
After that first day, however, something seems to have clicked for the Spitfire. They came back with back-to-back 3-0 sweeps against the Gladiators to reach the semi-finals, and have now dispatched the Valiant – who many were touting as favorites for the trophy – in the semi-finals without dropping a map.
London Spitfire is the first team to secure a place in the grand finals, which will take place in the Barclays Center in New York on July 27-28. Their opponent will be the winner between Philadelphia Fusion and New York Excelsior, a match that Philadelphia currently leads 1-0.
Blizzard Entertainment’s Vice President and Overwatch’s beloved Game Director Jeff Kaplan has revealed what he thinks is the ideal competitive meta for the expansive title.
Overwatch exists in many forms, from its highest ranks to its lowest, but the game’s competitive meta at the professional level has also varied greatly since the original release back in May 2016.
In the olden days, teams prioritized dive compositions led by Winston’s jumps and Tracer’s blinks. Then, in 2019, fans around the world either groaned or cheered as the divisive GOATS meta took center-stage, featuring a hefty squad built entirely with tanks and supports.
Now, Kaplan is explaining his perspective on the game’s ideal state, following criticisms he levied back in July against the game’s double-shield reliance. Examining the game’s departure from a static, Orisa and Sigma-dependent environment, he dissects his compository ideology.
Barriers have held an uncomfortably powerful role in Overwatch for a long time.
As discussed in an interview with the Loadout, Kaplan is both aware of the professional scene’s interests and the casual base’s tendencies. Coupling those factors, he believes the game is at its best when there is some blend of high skill caps and diverse team compositions.
“The most ideal, healthiest state of the game is when the meta is somewhat fluid, when the meta is more map dependent or team match up dependent than it is static. We’ve all seen those moments when the meta has been completely static and all six players will just play the same six heroes every time. I think that’s fun from a mastery standpoint, but I think it’s a lot more exciting for viewers when creativity and curiosity come into play,” he said.
When Kaplan refers to a “static” meta, the simplest example is 2019’s GOATS, where three healers (Brigitte, Lucio, and Moira) were coupled with three tanks (D.Va, Reinhardt, and Zarya) and would barrel into opponents.
It took tremendous teamwork to be pulled off successfully against other professional teams, but many fans considered it more tedious than entertaining after months of gameplay.
In its current state, Overwatch is not completely balanced, but there is a degree of variety to it. That diversity seen in the Overwatch League spans downward into the casual ranks. Kaplan indicates that this is in line with his department’s hopes.
“I think most of our players would say in the ideal meta, all our heroes would be viable in some way competitively. I think as a competitive goal from a game designing and game balancing perspective that is extremely challenging, but it’s obviously what we strive to achieve.”
While he assures that Overwatch would be completely balanced in an ideal world, in the meantime, his team would at least like to push toward a game that varies to some extent based on coaching, player preference, and map.
It remains to be seen if current and upcoming patches can accomplish that, but Kaplan’s emphasis on “fluidity” is a welcome driving force.