Chelsea fans trolled as EA FC 24 player ratings reveal “mid team” after $1 billion spent
EA SPORTSPlayers will be rewarded for their efforts in FIFA 23.
After one of the worst seasons in recent club history, rumors suggest Chelsa players will see major downgrades in EA FC 24. Understandably, Chelsea supporters received the brunt of the blow.
You would think investing just under a billion in players would equal instant success, but that’s far from the case under new Chelsea owner Todd Boehly. Like a house flipper, the American billionaire purchased the club in May 2022 and started a full renovation.
With over $600 million spent on transfers during the new owner’s first summer, all eyes were on Chelsea entering the 22/23 season. But instead of challenging for a title as some expected, Chelsea floundered to a 12th-place finish and cycled through three managers in the process.
In response to a dreadful season, Boehly cleaned house. 23 players departed the club, and the ambitious owner spent $450 million on new signings, bringing the total bill under his regime to around $1 billion.
However, you wouldn’t be able to tell the club spent that kind of money looking at their leaked EA FC 24 ratings.
EA SPORTSChelsea EA FC 24 ratings are “depressing” fans
Chelsea fan account Pys posted the leaked player ratings for EA FC 24 and couldn’t help but laugh over how poor they are.
It’s important to note that these ratings are leaks, and EA hasn’t confirmed them, But without any further ado, here is the result of a 12th-place finish and mass exodus.
| Player name | FIFA 23 Rating | Leaked EA FC 24 rating | Rating change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Christopher Nkunku | 86 | 86 | – |
| Reece James | 84 | 84 | – |
| Thiago Silva | 86 | 84 | -2 |
| Enzo Fernandez | 78 | 83 | +5 |
| Raheem Sterling | 86 | 83 | -3 |
| Ben Chilwell | 82 | 81 | -1 |
| Moises Caicedo | 70 | 80 | +10 |
| Wesley Fofana | 79 | 79 | – |
| Robert Sanchez | 77 | 79 | +2 |
| Axel Disasi | 77 | 79 | +2 |
| Benoit Badiashile | 77 | 78 | +1 |
| Conor Gallagher | 79 | 78 | -1 |
| Noni Madueke | 77 | 77 | – |
| Malo Gusto | 75 | 76 | +1 |
| Mykhailo Mudryk | 74 | 75 | +1 |
| Levi Colwill | 70 | 74 | +4 |
| Ian Maatsen | 70 | 74 | +4 |
| Romeo Lavia | 62 | 73 | +11 |
| Lesley Ugochukwu | 68 | 73 | +5 |
| Cole Palmer | 67 | 66 | -1 |
| Carney Cukwuemeka | 64 | 65 | +1 |
Rival supporters particularly called out Chelsea for spending $115 million on an 80-overall Moises Caicedo.
One fan responded: “$115 million just for an 80 overall rating.”
Other players questioned how Chelsea received any high player ratings, as a second user added: “EA was even generous with the ratings. It should’ve been lower than this.
Even Chelsea fans admitted that the ratings are probably accurate, with one disgruntled commenter responding: “We deserve it. Maybe that will wake their playing spirits.”
It’s unclear if these accurately represent the final ratings, but it’s not looking good for the once-dominant football giant.
