"CS:GO Wild has been exposed for being rigged and running the biggest fraud in the history of CS:GO gambling; their 'provably fair' system is staged and they used bots to play against their customers. Site operators (Vlad Nov) has access to the secret seed, thus giving him access to view all coinflip outcomes BEFORE entering the round. This is a fundamental issue with provably fair systems in Player vs. Player sites, as the site operators can always rig it by viewing the results beforehand and betting accordingly."
CS:GO Wild responded to the allegations, confirming their had been some issues since relaunching the site, due to transitioning their database from Europe to North America to better serve NA users.
Fun facts of the timeline of events yesterday: 1. Bots are playing on Wild coinflip 2. Wild owner gets exposed for the first time 3. ALL BOT STEAM PROFILES ARE TURNED PRIVATE AT THE SAME TIME 4. Coinflip bots are turned off at Wild immediately after— CSGOEmpire (@CSGOEmpire) December 30, 2017
"We've experienced some issues over the past week, some of which of have affected users and have been subject to scrutiny from other CS:GO skin sites. Over the last 36 hours, a rogue account gained access to the database, was able to credit themselves emeralds and view provably fair data of matches. Someone with access to the provably fair backend data would be able to join profitable coin flips which they would know they would win."CS:GO Wild claim to have caught the "rogue account", banned it and refunded all users who lost coinflips "to the dummy accounts with backend access". However, other sites remain unconvinced, citing that if a rogue account truly had backend access, they could simply withdraw every item, rather than spending time 'gambling' for 36 hours. In another statement by accusing site CS:GO Empire,
"Wild got caught for using bots to play against their customers and their only defense is to blame it on hackers."Another site developer, of CS:GO Gamble and Bets.gg, also supported the accusations, explaining that Wild had to be lying about the existence of a hacker or rogue accounts.
CS:GO Wild is yet to respond to the further accusations, but it certainly seems improbable that a user with complete backend access would be behave in the manner Wild suggests. x
then the bot would have 50/50 chance of winning/losing, it wouldn't have 90% win rate UNLESS the hash was manipulated and that steam id was rigged to win 90% of the games by wild itself, why would a hacker try to hide the fact he scammed wild? (3/3) @CSGOEmpire @csgolive— .mops (@dotmops) December 30, 2017