Top Fortnite Twitch streamer Brett ‘Dakotaz‘ Hoffman told a ‘fan’ exactly where to send themselves after receiving a donation message accusing him of ‘criminal’ behavior.
Best known for his Fortnite gameplay, Dakotaz has amassed over three million followers on his channel, and with such levels of popularity, encounters with ‘trolls’ are inevitable.
On March 12, a viewer donated 500 ‘bits’ (around $5), and left a message which accused Dakotaz of promoting Apex Legends, encouraging his viewers to play it, and then ditching the game to go back to Fortnite.
A disgruntled viewer sent Dakotaz an unexpected message in a donation.
The message explained “I just spent all this money and time on [Apex Legends] and you all just left. I feel very used and wronged. I think you need to take a hard look at how you all conduct yourselves because it is nearing criminal.”
It’s hard to tell if this message was entirely tongue-in-cheek, or if it was a genuine complaint, but Dakotaz quickly fired back.
“First off, go screw yourself, ok, that we’re just going to get out of the way. […] Second, I never got paid to play Apex, I played it on my own free will, so stuff it dude, go cry me a river. You’re a little baby. An entitled little shit you are.”
He then tells the donator to get out of his channel and move on to the next stream. After all, with tens of thousands of viewers, losing one won’t hurt.
Dakotaz isn’t the first streamer to receive negative remarks for doing paid promotions of games (even though he didn’t actually do a paid promotion for Apex Legends), as others like shroud have spoken up about the issue.
More game publishers are recognizing the influence of big name streamers, but no one but players themselves can be blamed for their purchase decisions.
Michael ‘shroud’ Grzesiek has claimed streamers should have taken a “united front” on the new DMCA rules to try and force Twitch to overturn them, and “could have won” if they did, after thousands of streamers deleted their old VODs to avoid being taken down, some dating back nearly a decade.
Twitch has ramped up its efforts in cracking down on streamers using licensed music. Streamers around the world have been rattled and rocked after receiving DMCA takedown notifications, with a massive wave sweeping across the platform on October 20.
It happened because most streamers play music in their streams, which means it’s also included in their library of video clips and VODs.
It’s a controversial issue that has happened in the past, but the latest ‘DMCA Bloodbath’ has been the biggest one yet. Hundreds of partnered streamers have been forced to take down and delete years worth of content, and it’s sparked a lot of outrage from streamers and viewers alike.
Michael ‘shroud’ Grzesiek mulled over the issue in his latest stream, and he came to the conclusion that streamers didn’t play their cards right. He believes they should have taken a “united front” on the issue and “hurt themselves” by not doing it sooner.
Shroud believes Twitch streamers needed to be on a “united front” to tackle the DMCA crackdown.
The first point shroud made was that, even if streamers obtained a license to skirt around the DMCA issues and play music on their stream, it wouldn’t solve the issue.
“If I was to get a license to play music on my stream, Twitch would not know,” he said. “Therefore, their Twitch music… algorithm that mutes VODs would still mute my VOD even though… I legally can do it.”
“So even getting a license right now doesn’t matter,” he added. “Because… you’re still going to get cucked.”
Shroud went on to describe the whole situation as “strange” because playing in silence for a moment. Then, he had another flurry of thoughts, which brought him to his final point that streamers should have been more united.
“If we as streamers took a united front and we didn’t just make rational f**king decisions and just start deleting sh*t, we actually could have won,” he said. “But now we hurt ourselves, so that sucks, but it is what it is. We folded. We’re a bunch of bi*ches.”
Shroud is referring to the fact that practically every streamer has been outraged by the decision. However, they ultimately succumbed to Twitch’s demands and deleted their VODS to avoid potential issues.
Many people will believe his frustration is warranted. However, at the same time, nobody can really blame other streamers for adhering to Twitch’s demands. After all, their livelihood depends on it.
The key takeaway, however, is that streamers could take shroud’s opinion on board in the future. If anything, partnered streamers are all pillars in the community. It couldn’t hurt for them to unite on matters when they really have to.
At the end of the day, workers in the ‘real world’ have associations, bodies, and unions to support them. So why should it be any different for streamers?